Again, obvious from the start. In fairness I knew more about the situation. Still, come on.
Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:09 pm
- floridagator
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:39 am
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
I have no idea why someone couldn't exit the Massachusetts Turnpike and then drive to Wooster, Ohio. It's enough to make me think taillight was spelled incorrectly.
I'd rather cuddle then have sex. If you're into grammar, you'll understand.
- This Is Kirk!
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
It was pretty poor. Essentially "name the last ruling family of the Russian Empire."MarkBarrett wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:31 am It would be sad if that FJ! clue did not go 2/2. Come on writers, really?
I would have said "Monitor and Virginia" for the ironclads clue. I'm sure there are other pedants out there who would have done the same.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:30 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Yes, up until that moment I thought this may be the day that James loses. Laura was almost as quick on the buzzer and had a decent knowledge base and with a little bit of luck things could have ended differently. But the DD was definitely an all-in situation and when she held back I gave up hope. (Not that I want to see James lose yet).BigDaddyMatty wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:44 am It didn't end up changing the outcome of the game, Laura's DD wager is a perfect illustration of the fact that on J!, fortune favors the bold. When she hit DD3, she was down $28,400 to $12,000. Knowing what James had already done, she had to know that by far her best shot of winning was to try to go into FJ! with the lead. However, instead of maximizing the chances of that happening by actually putting the hammer down, she went with a sorta-big wager of $7,000.
- bengland
- Jeopardy! Toker
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:49 am
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Don't be coy. Tell us more!
- jeff6286
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 5228
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:34 pm
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
The total tonnage of what he know that we don't could stun a team of oxen in its tracks.
Last edited by jeff6286 on Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- morbeedo
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:58 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Well, I'm glad he clarified, but it was not obvious to me that he wasn't involved with the website. I consider myself to be pretty objective and open-minded, and I had no prior knowledge about JH. I thought the comments online were a bit harsh and unfair, but I still can't understand why someone unknown to JH would want to make such a site.Austin Powers wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:09 amAgain, obvious from the start. In fairness I knew more about the situation. Still, come on.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
-
- Loyal Jeopardista
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:40 am
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
I remembered James from the Chase but i didn't recall his dominance, check it out
I prefer close competitive games but I believe he is deserving of his wins even though some answers were easier than the last two tests IMO.
I prefer close competitive games but I believe he is deserving of his wins even though some answers were easier than the last two tests IMO.
- This Is Kirk!
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Maybe it was Roger Craig? Nah, Roger would have produced a much nicer site.Austin Powers wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:11 pmMy favorite theory was that I did the website. That one made me chuckle.
- alietr
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8977
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:20 pm
- Location: Bethesda, MD
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
So someone denying something on Facebook is proof positive? (This is not a comment on whether he was involved or not.)
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
OTH, I limped through making a Geocities site when I was younger. Today I have trouble making text bold[/]This Is Kirk! wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:27 pm Maybe it was Roger Craig? Nah, Roger would have produced a much nicer site.
- irene
- Valued Contributor
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:33 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
TenPoundHammer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:51 pm Even with a couple stumbles, he was still unstoppable.
====
I can never remember which is VT and which is NH,
For me, an easy way to remember which is which: Vermont is somewhat V-shaped, while New Hampshire is not.
- TheSunWillComeOut
- Two-Morrow
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
Also, "authored by me" =/= "affiliated with me/known to me," which I think is the more interesting question here. If it's not him or someone known to him, who is it, exactly? I'm raising a very high eyebrow at everyone clapping their hands and going, "Well, that solves it!", as if it makes perfect sense that someone among the 100-200 folks who accidentally stumbled across this guy at a taping would be inspired to register a domain in his name for 10 years, make sure their own identity is cloaked, give 0 indication of why this champ sparked their fancy so (no "Hi! I'm John! As a professional gambler myself, I was instantly struck by one of our own made good..."), and devotedly update it day by day. What is the end goal here? What is this person personally getting out of this activity?
This is weird behavior no matter how you read it, and y'all are being weird in shrugging it off.
- Robert K S
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 5247
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:26 pm
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
"My facebook page is the only web site about me that I made" is the J!-world equivalent of the president saying "the Mueller Report completely exonerates me". Somebody made the page after obtaining inside information, most likely second- or third-hand, since the initial draft of the page had the detail wrong of when James would set a record. There's evident love put into the page--it's not simply slapped together--so whoever did it is obviously not a complete stranger to the contestant with no vested interest in James receiving publicity. And whoever maintains it has updated it repeatedly in response to criticism--first for the spoilers, second for the pictures, third for calling the defeated challengers "The Humbled" (now they're "The Hopeful" or "Worthy Adversaries"), so whoever it is, is at least making an afford to address online remarks for James's benefit (i.e., so as not to make James seem like a jerk). Those who know more but decline to disclose can perversely revel, which is fine, but they can't dust off their hands with a facebook post and say, "See? Mystery solved!"
- Woof
- Swimming in the Jeopardy! Pool
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 9:53 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
I agree that James has settled all question of whether he deserves to be ranked among the greatest of the superchamps. My question, for those of you know who keep track of such things, is how does James's average Coryat compare to the best ever?hbomb1947 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:51 pm Another ho-hum performance by James. He's been so phenomenal that a $54,000-plus payday seems like nothing special for him. I do suspect that he'll be the player to break the curse of top winners not winning their TOC's. He combines being the top winner with the style of play that enabled Roger Craig and Alex Jacob to knock off higher seeds in their TOC's. It also seems clear that he's equipped to handle the jump in difficulty of material that the TOC will present. But it'll be very interesting to see it all play out, because the other members of the field will know what they're up against and will have had ample time to prepare.
ETA: on the Argonauts clue, the rest of the clue led me to Argonauts but I was hesitant to ring in bc I hadn't heard of an a sea creature with that name.
Is James the first contestant to have runaways in 4 of his or her first 5 games? Even Ken "only" had 3.
-
- Voyeur
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:00 pm
- Location: Princeton, NJ
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
If it is determined that Holzhauer did indeed create the site his status for the TOC will come into serious doubt.Robert K S wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:30 pm "My facebook page is the only web site about me that I made" is the J!-world equivalent of the president saying "the Mueller Report completely exonerates me". Somebody made the page after obtaining inside information, most likely second- or third-hand, since the initial draft of the page had the detail wrong of when James would set a record. There's evident love put into the page--it's not simply slapped together--so whoever did it is obviously not a complete stranger to the contestant with no vested interest in James receiving publicity. And whoever maintains it has updated it repeatedly in response to criticism--first for the spoilers, second for the pictures, third for calling the defeated challengers "The Humbled" (now they're "The Hopeful" or "Worthy Adversaries"), so whoever it is, is at least making an afford to address online remarks for James's benefit (i.e., so as not to make James seem like a jerk). Those who know more but decline to disclose can perversely revel, which is fine, but they can't dust off their hands with a facebook post and say, "See? Mystery solved!"
- This Is Kirk!
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:35 am
- Location: Seattle
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
I think this is very doubtful. James is going to be a popular champ who may be one of the greatest players ever. It's going to take something a whole lot more egregious than that to keep him out of the TOC.
- hbomb1947
- Still hoping to get on Jeopardy! while my age is in double digits
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
I will acknowledge that that's what his haters were wishing for.harrumph wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:39 pmIf it is determined that Holzhauer did indeed create the site his status for the TOC will come into serious doubt.Robert K S wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:30 pm "My facebook page is the only web site about me that I made" is the J!-world equivalent of the president saying "the Mueller Report completely exonerates me". Somebody made the page after obtaining inside information, most likely second- or third-hand, since the initial draft of the page had the detail wrong of when James would set a record. There's evident love put into the page--it's not simply slapped together--so whoever did it is obviously not a complete stranger to the contestant with no vested interest in James receiving publicity. And whoever maintains it has updated it repeatedly in response to criticism--first for the spoilers, second for the pictures, third for calling the defeated challengers "The Humbled" (now they're "The Hopeful" or "Worthy Adversaries"), so whoever it is, is at least making an afford to address online remarks for James's benefit (i.e., so as not to make James seem like a jerk). Those who know more but decline to disclose can perversely revel, which is fine, but they can't dust off their hands with a facebook post and say, "See? Mystery solved!"
Follow me on twitter, even though I rarely tweet! https://twitter.com/hbomb_worldwide
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Game Recap and Discussion (SPOILERS)
We habitually offer STRONG OPINIONS about a game show. “Being weird” was a boundary crossed well over a decade ago.TheSunWillComeOut wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:20 pmAlso, "authored by me" =/= "affiliated with me/known to me," which I think is the more interesting question here. If it's not him or someone known to him, who is it, exactly? I'm raising a very high eyebrow at everyone clapping their hands and going, "Well, that solves it!", as if it makes perfect sense that someone among the 100-200 folks who accidentally stumbled across this guy at a taping would be inspired to register a domain in his name for 10 years, make sure their own identity is cloaked, give 0 indication of why this champ sparked their fancy so (no "Hi! I'm John! As a professional gambler myself, I was instantly struck by one of our own made good..."), and devotedly update it day by day. What is the end goal here? What is this person personally getting out of this activity?
This is weird behavior no matter how you read it, and y'all are being weird in shrugging it off.