Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion [SPOILERS]
Moderators: alietr, trainman, econgator, dhkendall
- billy pilgrim
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
FJ! almost stumped me because I knew that the book came out well before the movie. I also had heard ( in a SHC maybe?) that at one point the book was called Catch-18. The 'casino heist movie' finally convinced me Catch-22 had to be right.
She caught the Katy and left me a mule to ride.
- MarkBarrett
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 16467
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:37 am
- Location: San Francisco
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
For Tool Shed I had no problem figuring out compass even though I think of the instrument more for drafting or math than fitting with saws and such.
The Lincoln category's first four I could have guessed without seeing the clues. The Stanton quote was a good one for the last box as I failed to recall that one in time even though I knew I had seen it recently in the Bill O'Reilly book. The DD in the third box would have been $800 like Stephanie's wager plus whatever else I had on the scoreboard.
That DJ round got me good with skunks in both Art Terms and "Sin"full. Ducks was just about as bad in getting teal, but giving it right back trying barge for raft. Guessing Nashville for Memphis was one where it would help to be second best on the buzzer.
Rookie Blue for $2000 in TV Characters? I think it was worth at least $3000.
For the FJ clue doubling eleven to get to 22 and naming a novel doesn't take long. Bamaman working with 225.5 gave me good laugh and I'm glad he kept working on the clue.
Stephanie's time between tapings let her recharge to be ready for another strong Monday. Ricky and John have to be cursing the luck of the draw. Boards, buzzer, or opponents can all sink you before you know where the half hour went.
The Lincoln category's first four I could have guessed without seeing the clues. The Stanton quote was a good one for the last box as I failed to recall that one in time even though I knew I had seen it recently in the Bill O'Reilly book. The DD in the third box would have been $800 like Stephanie's wager plus whatever else I had on the scoreboard.
That DJ round got me good with skunks in both Art Terms and "Sin"full. Ducks was just about as bad in getting teal, but giving it right back trying barge for raft. Guessing Nashville for Memphis was one where it would help to be second best on the buzzer.
Rookie Blue for $2000 in TV Characters? I think it was worth at least $3000.
For the FJ clue doubling eleven to get to 22 and naming a novel doesn't take long. Bamaman working with 225.5 gave me good laugh and I'm glad he kept working on the clue.
Stephanie's time between tapings let her recharge to be ready for another strong Monday. Ricky and John have to be cursing the luck of the draw. Boards, buzzer, or opponents can all sink you before you know where the half hour went.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:15 am
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
With six wins & $123,970, Stephanie moves into second place in the 2011-13 ToC standings.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:31 am
- Location: Queens
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I don't agree with you on that Tennessee clue as I can't name more than one suburb of Nashville of the top of my head. And yeah, Rookie Blue was a baadddddddddddd show. It seems recent TV shows always feature Two and a Half Men and The Big Bang Theory.MarkBarrett wrote:For Tool Shed I had no problem figuring out compass even though I think of the instrument more for drafting or math than fitting with saws and such.
The Lincoln category's first four I could have guessed without seeing the clues. The Stanton quote was a good one for the last box as I failed to recall that one in time even though I knew I had seen it recently in the Bill O'Reilly book. The DD in the third box would have been $800 like Stephanie's wager plus whatever else I had on the scoreboard.
That DJ round got me good with skunks in both Art Terms and "Sin"full. Ducks was just about as bad in getting teal, but giving it right back trying barge for raft. Guessing Nashville for Memphis was one where it would help to be second best on the buzzer.
Rookie Blue for $2000 in TV Characters? I think it was worth at least $3000.
For the FJ clue doubling eleven to get to 22 and naming a novel doesn't take long. Bamaman working with 225.5 gave me good laugh and I'm glad he kept working on the clue.
Stephanie's time between tapings let her recharge to be ready for another strong Monday. Ricky and John have to be cursing the luck of the draw. Boards, buzzer, or opponents can all sink you before you know where the half hour went.
Also David's comment on not being able to think of a novel that has a "22" in its title is quite funny. haha
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
DJ! board ate me alive for some reason. Answers never came, went 9R/2W...and I had such a good J! board too.
Final was an instant, then about halfway through I figured out the movie they were referencing (cause I realized I had time to kill).
Here's some random trivia...they seem to have the death bed in the Petersen House fully enclosed in plexiglass now. When I visited, near 20 years ago, only the pillow was enclosed. Rest of the bed was open air. (Why I remember that, heck if I know...)
Final was an instant, then about halfway through I figured out the movie they were referencing (cause I realized I had time to kill).
Here's some random trivia...they seem to have the death bed in the Petersen House fully enclosed in plexiglass now. When I visited, near 20 years ago, only the pillow was enclosed. Rest of the bed was open air. (Why I remember that, heck if I know...)
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
- econgator
- Let's Go Mets!
- Posts: 10671
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:32 am
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
*nod*MarkBarrett wrote:Guessing Nashville for Memphis was one where it would help to be second best on the buzzer.
Nashville -- 601,222
Memphis -- 646,889
It's not like it's a runaway.
- Dr. J
- Decade Battler and Mustache Maker
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
There's nothing meaningful there; I just like embellished tops/sweaters, and that's what Target is selling these daysPaucle wrote:DrJ, my mom called me to mention she noticed you have roses on every top you've worn so far. She asked me "I wonder if there's something behind that?" So, now I'm asking!
Thanks for the kind words, folks. I was feeling rejuvenated on Monday, and the boards had lots of categories that I liked today. I was pretty excited about Sic Semper Tyrannus -- I've had that nugget sitting there in my brain and it just popped forward at the right time. (My dad, a serious Lincoln scholar, knew all the rest!)
By the time this episode taped, my husband had found out about the women's record, so I was gunning for that going forward.
- econgator
- Let's Go Mets!
- Posts: 10671
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:32 am
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
When I was there in 2010, it was enclosed by plexi on 2 sides (and the walls on the other 2). The top was open.Volante wrote:Here's some random trivia...they seem to have the death bed in the Petersen House fully enclosed in plexiglass now. When I visited, near 20 years ago, only the pillow was enclosed. Rest of the bed was open air. (Why I remember that, heck if I know...)
- Volante
- Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Well...hard to tell that from the video clue!econgator wrote:When I was there in 2010, it was enclosed by plexi on 2 sides (and the walls on the other 2). The top was open.Volante wrote:Here's some random trivia...they seem to have the death bed in the Petersen House fully enclosed in plexiglass now. When I visited, near 20 years ago, only the pillow was enclosed. Rest of the bed was open air. (Why I remember that, heck if I know...)
Still more than there was before.
The best thing that Neil Armstrong ever did, was to let us all imagine we were him.
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Latest movies (1-10): Everything Everywhere All at Once (10), Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken (6), Black Sunday /1960/ (6), Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (7)
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Wow, I didn't think Memphis was anywhere near that. I didn't think BNA because I know it has a lot of suburbs, and wasn't sure if they were going for MSA or city proper. I almost said Knoxville after Nashville was negged.econgator wrote:*nod*MarkBarrett wrote:Guessing Nashville for Memphis was one where it would help to be second best on the buzzer.
Nashville -- 601,222
Memphis -- 646,889
Best rank ever.Volante wrote:Harbinger of the Doomed Lemur
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 303
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:57 am
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Bamaman wrote:I've never heard sic semper tyrannus used anywhere other than Lincoln's murder. Where else have you heard it?
Specifically, in a FJ! c. late 1980s (sorry, couldn't remember the date).
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
TenPoundHammer wrote:I remembered reading something about Catch-22 once being called "Catch-18", so it was the first book I ruled out.
When the clue came out, I called out "I know this one!", I had read an article recently on, yup, mental_floss, about edits to famous works that turned out for the better, the first one is about Catch-22 and the process its name went through, they said pretty much the same stuff that econgator quoted off Wikipedia in reply #7, but you should read it anyways, because, come on, it's mental_floss. I only jsut started reading it (online) this month, and it already has got me some pretty sweet gets and I believe recently helped a champ (either Brendan or Stephanie, forget which) get their FJ! as well. I'm going to go out and say that it should be required reading for anyone who wants to get on the show, and I"m not just saying that because I hope that my public shilling will get me a paid subscription so that I can improve my own chances of getting on ...Austin Powers wrote:I always thought Catch-22 was once Catch-18, but was changed to 22 because Mila 18 by Leon Uris was coming out.
I think Alex would have spotted her the extra $30 from his own pocket.legendneverdies wrote:Stephanie becomes only the second female in the nine years of unlimited appearances to win six games, with Larissa Kelly being the other. A win tomorrow of course sets a record for her with seven wins. Stephanie would not have cracked $100K, as Alex said at the beginning of the show she was guaranteed to, if she finished third(she'd have had $99970)
Hi, Nicco! You misheard, I just finished watching my tape and it indeed said "this state capital", so "Sacramento" is correct. Hopefully soon, the "official"* transcript of the show will be up at j-archive.com and this will verify that.Nicci wrote:Hi, just a quick question: Didn't it state " this STATE'S capital......" So the answer would have been "what is California?" Not the accepted answer " what is Sacramento?" Did anyone else hear that?
*Note, not in any ways official. The Jeopardy! game show and all elements thereof, including but not limited to copyright and trademark thereto, are the property of Jeopardy Productions, Inc. and are protected under law. J-archive is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or operated by Jeopardy Productions, Inc.
I could see how it would be used on Wikipedia a lot, some of those edit wars can get NASTY!TenPoundHammer wrote:Almost certainly where I heard it. In any event, I see far more uses on Wikipedia than just Lincoln's murder.bpmod wrote:Isn't it the state motto of one of those states? Virginia, maybe?Bamaman wrote:I've never heard sic semper tyrannus used anywhere other than Lincoln's murder. Where else have you heard it?
WikipediaUser6969: "Sic semper tyrannis!" *revert article*
I figured John was the only one introduced as a "camp counselor" on the show (well, of course besides Stefan), but searching gives one other. All of them are introduced with "day jobs" as well, guess camp counselling doesn't pay well ...
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- billy pilgrim
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
I think the category was CITY founders, so no.Nicci wrote:Hi, just a quick question: Didn't it state " this STATE'S capital......" So the answer would have been "what is California?" Not the accepted answer " what is Sacramento?" Did anyone else hear that?
She caught the Katy and left me a mule to ride.
- dhkendall
- Pursuing the Dream
- Posts: 8789
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:49 am
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
- Contact:
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
That was the category, but if it did say "this state's capital", there might not be a correct answer, as that wording would clearly want a state.billy pilgrim wrote:I think the category was CITY founders, so no.Nicci wrote:Hi, just a quick question: Didn't it state " this STATE'S capital......" So the answer would have been "what is California?" Not the accepted answer " what is Sacramento?" Did anyone else hear that?
However, the wording was "this state capital", so it's moot on that point.
"Jeopardy! is two parts luck and one part luck" - Me
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
"The way to win on Jeopardy is to be a rabidly curious, information-omnivorous person your entire life." - Ken Jennings
Follow my progress game by game since 2012
- opusthepenguin
- The Best Darn Penguin on the Whole JBoard
- Posts: 10319
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
- Location: Shawnee, KS
- Contact:
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
dhkendall wrote:Hi, Nicco! You misheard, I just finished watching my tape and it indeed said "this state capital", so "Sacramento" is correct. Hopefully soon, the "official"* transcript of the show will be up at j-archive.com and this will verify that.Nicci wrote:Hi, just a quick question: Didn't it state " this STATE'S capital......" So the answer would have been "what is California?" Not the accepted answer " what is Sacramento?" Did anyone else hear that?
- jpahk
- Jeopardy! TOCer
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:16 am
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
me too. i was hoping that an american history category + only 3rd row clue would finally let us see a big bet here, but perhaps derringer at $400 scared her off. or perhaps the fact that the first clue took alex 20 minutes (estimated) to actually get around to asking something had her worried about losing the thread of the clue, as happened to dr. tom vaughn on the medicine DD in this game.MarkBarrett wrote:The Lincoln category's first four I could have guessed without seeing the clues. The Stanton quote was a good one for the last box as I failed to recall that one in time even though I knew I had seen it recently in the Bill O'Reilly book. The DD in the third box would have been $800 like Stephanie's wager plus whatever else I had on the scoreboard.
i didn't know the last words, but i was able to get stanton because his position as secretary of war led directly to andrew johnson's impeachment. stanton was a holdover in johnson's cabinet, which was critical because the pretense for impeachment was violation of the tenure of office act.
this doesn't let her off the hook for lincoln. in the first round, no matter how big your lead is, it's not safe. even early in the second round, a big lead isn't safe. in my 6th game, i hit the first DD of the second round on a bottom-row clue with the scores 14200-3200-3000. i bet it all and got it right; if i'd bet $2000 (stephanie's largest bet to date, unless i'm forgetting one), then i would have likely* gone into FJ without a lock. (i say likely because i don't know how much i would have bet on the second DD—which i missed—if i'd had a smaller lead. i can't imagine i would have utterly turtled up there, so i'm guessing it wouldn't have been a lock.) and in fact, i missed that FJ, although both of my opponents did too.thenextofken wrote:Thing is, she hasn't really needed to bet big, judging by the fact that her wins consist of four locks and two crushes. Today she was so far ahead in DJ there really wasn't a whole lot of point to risking letting her two opponents back into the game.
anyway, i'm not advocating betting big willy-nilly; i'm advocating wagering big when doing so increases your chances of winning. for a player with a super-strong knowledge base like stephanie (or, to name the most comparable player i can think of, dave madden, who got a remarkable 96% of his DDs right during his run, but rarely wagered more than $2k on them), a DD in the 2nd or 3rd row is almost a dead cinch. leaving that money on the table is opening yourself up to being caught, especially if you have a spotty record in FJ. and in the first round, except in rare cases*, there's so much game left (and so much money left) that you should essentially be trying to maximize your expected value rather than worrying about the relative scores. translation: if you judge your chances on the clue to be better than 50%, you should bet the max.
(* i actually think today's lincoln DD was one of those rare cases, because it was so late in the round and she was already ahead by so much. but i still think a hefty bet of $5000+ was called for, if not all $9k or $10k.)
having said all that, i want to congratulate stephanie on another dominating performance, this time capped by a successful response in FJ. fun to watch, as always. keep it up tomorrow! i pick the only nit i can, just because i want to see the highest level of play in the ToC.
- Dr. J
- Decade Battler and Mustache Maker
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
It was Erik's "Nixon in China" FJ, actually.dhkendall wrote: I believe (Mental Floss) recently helped a champ (either Brendan or Stephanie, forget which) get their FJ! as well.
-
- Jeopardy! Champion
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
"Catch-18" was one of the "Famous Titles" from my TD, which you entered, so perhaps that's it. I would have guessed that that Catch 22 would have pre-dated Ocean's 11, but that did seem to be where the clue was pointing. (I figured that if it wasn't the response, Catch-22 would have been massive neg bait)billy pilgrim wrote:FJ! almost stumped me because I knew that the book came out well before the movie. I also had heard ( in a SHC maybe?) that at one point the book was called Catch-18. The 'casino heist movie' finally convinced me Catch-22 had to be right.
I was a bit surprised that Alex was familiar with Upper Canada College, the school mentioned by the second contestant, though I hadn't realized until looking it up that Alex finished high school in Toronto. (I also then learned that Alex went to a high school located on the same street that I live on in Ottawa - about a 1/2 mile down - with his University being about the same distance away in the other direction... ironic*)
I'm interested to see the wording for the "Rookie Blue" clue when it appears the archive . I skimmed it, saw 'blah blah blah cop show set in Toronto' and assumed it was about "Flashpoint". I wasn't surprised when the Torontonian rang in and said just that, but was rather surprised when Alex said no.
*the word seems to have a different definition in Ottawa, see Alanis Morissette's song for examples of how some Ottawans use the term.
-
- Watches Jeopardy! Way Too Much
- Posts: 6030
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:55 pm
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
It's worth pointing out that this Wikipedia reference is sourced to an academic volume on "The Compositional Histories of Notable American Writings." I'd only heard the "Mila 18" story myself, but the clue was explicit enough to make "Catch 22" a pretty easy get.econgator wrote:
I went straight from Ocean's Eleven to Catch-22. Done.
Here's what wiki swikipedia wrote:The title is a reference to a fictional bureaucratic stipulation which embodies forms of illogical and immoral reasoning. The opening chapter of the novel was originally published in New World Writing as Catch-18 in 1955, but Heller's agent, Candida Donadio, requested that he change the title of the novel, so it would not be confused with another recently published World War II novel, Leon Uris's Mila 18. The number 18 has special meaning in Judaism (it means Alive in Gematria) and was relevant to early drafts of the novel which had a somewhat greater Jewish emphasis.
The title Catch-11 was suggested, with the duplicated 1 paralleling the repetition found in a number of character exchanges in the novel, but because of the release of the 1960 movie Ocean's Eleven, this was also rejected. Catch-17 was rejected so as not to be confused with the World War II film Stalag 17, as was Catch-14, apparently because the publisher did not feel that 14 was a "funny number." Eventually the title came to be Catch-22, which, like 11, has a duplicated digit, with the 2 also referring to a number of déjà vu-like events common in the novel.
There's another tradition that what Stanton said was "Now he belongs to the angels." I assume they would have accepted that as well.
A very good New Yorker article from a few years ago on the subject-
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007 ... act_gopnik
Or, especially since it's in the top box, just quote the clue back...Green Park. I doubt they really expected many players to have heard of it. And similarly, there's no more Pavlovian Chinese dish than Peking Duck, and the clue told you to drop the "g..."TenPoundHammer wrote:That's the problem with some Stupid Answers clues — if you don't know, there are often far too many potential guesses. Reservoir Park? Queen's Park? Basin Park? Grace Park? Formerly Park? Called Park? This Park?marpocky wrote:That's the only one I didn't get from the category (well, you told us the answer, but I'm counting it as a miss since I wouldn't have made the right guess). NHO that park.
Re: Monday, October 15, 2012 Game Recap & Discussion (SPOILERS)
Huh. I honestly can't say I've seen anything duck at our local Chinese restaurant, or any of the 40 billion others I've been to. I would've thought the most Pavlovian Chinese dish would be something like chow mein, egg foo yung, egg rolls, etc. I would've even thought of General Tso's Chicken before ever getting to the duck stuff.davey wrote:Or, especially since it's in the top box, just quote the clue back...Green Park. I doubt they really expected many players to have heard of it. And similarly, there's no more Pavlovian Chinese dish than Peking Duck, and the clue told you to drop the "g..."TenPoundHammer wrote:That's the problem with some Stupid Answers clues — if you don't know, there are often far too many potential guesses. Reservoir Park? Queen's Park? Basin Park? Grace Park? Formerly Park? Called Park? This Park?